John McClain - Sun Microsystems, Inc. wrote: > Jim Hurley wrote: >> On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Frank Barnaby wrote: >>> I've done a test build with the serviceui sources moved into the jtsk >>> source tree (namespaces unchanged) and have found no obvious problems. >> >> Thanks Frank. >> >>> One other question comes to mind... How should we handle the logstore >>> portion of the outrigger build? Should we leave it as is, disable it >>> in the build, or remove the sources completely? If we leave it as is, >>> we would need to consider including the prebuilt-outrigger-logstore.jar >>> in the source distribution, as Phil suggested, to allow builds without >>> the need for a Jini installation. Disabling the logstore jar'ing >>> target, on the other hand, removes the dependency on the Jini binary >>> installation but leaves the logstore sources in a unaltered state. >>> In all cases, logstore cannot be used without pro.zip (the PSEpro >>> runtime library), but persistence is still attainable through the use >>> of the snaplogstore implementation. >> >> I'd lean towards what's expedient to get out "AR1" in short order -- but >> I do think we're going to have to bite the bullet and probably remove >> logstore from the build going forward. It doesn't seem to have long >> term viability. > > My vote is to remove logstore altogether and do it for AR1. >
+1
