Gregg Wonderly wrote: > Bob Scheifler wrote: >> Gregg Wonderly wrote: >> >>> Perhaps in view that jar layouts may change further, there might be >>> an official directory of deprecated jars so that documentation and >>> discussions can focus on the nature of those jars? >> >> Moving the existing deprecated jars (jini-core.jar, jini-ext.jar, >> sdm-dl.jar, sun-util.jar) could break existing scripts/etc that >> reference them, so if the desire is for AR1 to maintain maximum >> compatibility, it would seem preferable to leave them where they are. > > Your call, but my thoughts are that there will already be some changes > involved in testing and integrating AR1, for many. So, having to change > some referred to directory structures, etc, may not be a big impact > overall. >
What do the rest of the user-base think about this? ^^^ How much backward compatibility does everybody expect in this first release? Anybody out there? > I still use jini-core, jini-ext and sun-util myself. I copy these files Can you explain more about why you use these? > out of the distribution into a secondary, versioned structure (because I > have made many edits on my copy of the 2.1 source tree). The source of > those jars is abstracted by this fact. > > Gregg Wonderly > Dan.
