Ya, I'd help with a Hudson setup. The fact that Continuum is an
Apache project is neither here nor there. Every project is free to
decide the technologies it uses.
+1 to Hudson as our CI build server.
Nige
On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
Sorry, no. I use Hudson...much easier to configure IMO.
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/
I'm appreciative of Phil setting up the Continuum process for us,
but is
using Hudson a better/preferred option for our project? Nigel, would
you be interested in helping with that?
Or is that discouraged as Continuum is an Apache project and Hudson
is not? Don't want to open a can of worms here but want to have
something
the Community can support.
-Jim
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
Phil? Nigel? Anyone with Continuum experience that can help here?
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Frank Barnaby wrote:
:
I'm sorry if I mislead you. I'm not averse to modifying the
Continuum
process, and I do indeed have the appropriate account
permissions to do
so. At the moment, however, I just lack experience with
Continuum. I
just wanted to know if anyone could provide a quick answer
before I start
digging deeper. I also didn't want to assume that I own it, so
I left it
as an unassigned issue on the table.
