Awesome, thanks Nige.
It seems like Hudson will/may be our longer term solution, but I'm
guessing
that will all take a bit to setup. In trying to push AR1 the last
few steps
to release... I'd like to try to modify (the build targets) of the
current
Continuum build to include building the zip bundles. That only works if
there's an archive area from Continuum to access the built zip bundles.
Phil? Someone? Can you help here?
If that's not going to work, we'll have to drop back and just the build
candidates on someone's machine and make them available.
-Jim
On Nov 8, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
I have asked on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if we can get access to a
box to setup a Hudson instance. Another incubator project I'm
involved with also wants to use Hudson.
Nige
On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
Sorry, no. I use Hudson...much easier to configure IMO.
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/
I'm appreciative of Phil setting up the Continuum process for us,
but is
using Hudson a better/preferred option for our project? Nigel, would
you be interested in helping with that?
Or is that discouraged as Continuum is an Apache project and Hudson
is not? Don't want to open a can of worms here but want to have
something
the Community can support.
-Jim
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
Phil? Nigel? Anyone with Continuum experience that can help here?
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Frank Barnaby wrote:
:
I'm sorry if I mislead you. I'm not averse to modifying the
Continuum
process, and I do indeed have the appropriate account
permissions to do
so. At the moment, however, I just lack experience with
Continuum. I
just wanted to know if anyone could provide a quick answer
before I start
digging deeper. I also didn't want to assume that I own it, so
I left it
as an unassigned issue on the table.
