Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[modified subject]
On Dec 14, 2007 11:41 AM, Mark Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any reasons why the above branching strategy is not going to
work or is a bad thing.
Looks nice and clean to me.
In general I think we should try to keep most development happening in
trunk, with mostly just backported bug fixes and minor organizational
work going to branches.
The mentioned feature branches should IMHO only be used in exceptional
circumstances. Almost all normal development can and should happen
within the trunk in cooperation with other developers.
Thanks for responding Jukka,
As you mention "Almost all normal development can and should happen
within the trunk in cooperation with other developers", do you have a
good suggestion to find out who is working on which versioned objects
given SVN as our SCM.
Given the large amount of scheduled and assigned issues for AR2 I think
there is a significant amount of overlap with versioned objects already,
I and others could publish a list of all files being touched but
otherwise I can't come up with an idea to let others know what I'm touching.
--
Mark
