Hi, On Dec 17, 2007 1:11 PM, Mark Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the short notation for the /root/tags/m.n.r but prefer not to mix > the sustained development with the /branches which I prefer to keep for > whatever ad hoc purpose we need to branch, I also like the short > notation for the sustained development.
What would such ad hoc purposes be? My advice is not to use "development branches" if there's any way to avoid them. Each such branch is essentially a fork of the project. > I get the feeling that /branches represent what I used to call our > /skunk branch (named after skunkworks) where no strict development > policies apply and I think that a uniform policy should apply to each > branch (besides the /branch branch) and therefore no mix of ad hoc > branches with sustained development. Could you describe what such branches are used for and how you typically use them? I'm a bit worried about how well this concept would work for a distributed development community, but perhaps I'm overreacting. BR, Jukka Zitting
