Not an objection. I wanted to express agreement about 2.1.2. -jeff
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Peter Firmstone <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mark, > > We need people like yourself to watch the list and provide some guidance > when you can. > > We had a discussion about it earlier, I'd like to get this release out, I'm > holding back commits that depend on Java 5 language features. > > Jonathan made a similar comment about the release versioning earlier, if > someone wants to make that change, then now is the time to do so. > > Does anyone have any objection to the use of version 2.1.2 instead of > version 2.2.0? > > Cheers, > > Peter.
