Glad your still with us Jonathan, hope your dev box gets fixed soon ;-)
Your ray tracing example sounds interesting, more fun than hello world!
Cheers,
Peter.
Jonathan Costers wrote:
Hi all
Sorry I haven't been too active lately, but I am still watching river-dev as
much as I can.
For what it's worth, I think it would make more sense to go for 2.1.2 for
the reasons mentioned before. However, I don't think this is very important
... Most important is that we have a new release with a bunch of
changes/fixes!
I don't believe it is much work to change from 2.2 to 2.1.2 (a small change
in the build.xml file, plus some documentation updates).
I'd do it myself, but my development machine recently died and I am waiting
for it to be fixed. This is also the reason why I haven't committed anything
lately (there are some things pending in my local workspace: the ray tracing
example added to the project, several fixes/improvements to build.xml,
several improvements to fix failing QA tests, etc.)
Thanks Peter for getting stuff moving! We seem to be almost there.
Best to all
Jonathan
2010/1/5 Jeff Ramsdale <[email protected]>
Not an objection. I wanted to express agreement about 2.1.2.
-jeff
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Peter Firmstone <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks Mark,
We need people like yourself to watch the list and provide some guidance
when you can.
We had a discussion about it earlier, I'd like to get this release out,
I'm
holding back commits that depend on Java 5 language features.
Jonathan made a similar comment about the release versioning earlier, if
someone wants to make that change, then now is the time to do so.
Does anyone have any objection to the use of version 2.1.2 instead of
version 2.2.0?
Cheers,
Peter.
