Re: converting RegistrarImpl to public class

[Dan Creswell]

>
>
>  A factory makes it nice and easy to get what one is after whilst providing
>> a
>> layer of separation that affords a lot of flex in building exactly what's
>> required.
>>
>
> Shall we go for a 'protected' for both registrar implementations then?
> Because if you want to work with the binary dist, and stay out of the
> package space for river, work without reflection, you need to have some
> access.
>
>
Okay, works for me.