Embedded feels like the wrong name as I could easily imagine having non-embedded services taking a reference to a config directly purely because of "neatness".
Almost feels like that constructor has wider utility than merely embedding.... On 10 January 2011 16:23, Sim IJskes - QCG <s...@qcg.nl> wrote: > Any objections to adding a EmbeddedNonActivatableServiceDescriptor modeled > like NonActivatableServiceDescriptor but looking for the constructor > signature: > > <impl>(Configuration config, LifeCycle lc) > > Gr. Sim > > -- > QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl > Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397 >
