K so the bit I most care about is not tying this constructor to Embedded alone so how about we compromise:
Create EmbeddedDescriptor as you plan and then add a backlog item to update other descriptors to optionally exploit this new constructor as well. ? On 10 January 2011 16:35, Sim IJskes - QCG <s...@qcg.nl> wrote: > On 10-01-11 17:31, Dan Creswell wrote: > >> Embedded feels like the wrong name as I could easily imagine having >> non-embedded services taking a reference to a config directly purely >> because >> of "neatness". >> > > I agree, but i couldn't come up with a better one. Proposal? > > >
