On 10-01-11 20:27, Christopher Dolan wrote:
I would strongly support a change to 'public' with a 'protected' constructor. Currently my RegistrarImpl subclass has to live in the com.sun.jini.reggie package, which I find distasteful. The primary purpose of that subclass is to have a public constructor, so I would also be happy if RegistrarImpl had a public constructor (or factory method).
Whish granted in trunk. -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
