> > > Maybe it's just me, but right now it feels like we're arguing about > whether or not the work is necessary. If people are willing to do it > (in a branch) - and I think that they are - then the best thing to do > is to review what they've done when it's finished and vote on whether > or not that change should be moved into the trunk*. > > +1
- Re: build mechanisms Peter Firmstone
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- Re: build mechanisms Peter Firmstone
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- Re: build mechanisms Peter Firmstone
- Re: build mechanisms Dennis Reedy
- Re: build mechanisms Jonathan Costers
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- Re: build mechanisms Tom Hobbs
- Re: build mechanisms Dan Creswell
- Re: build mechanisms Peter Firmstone
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- [VOTE] Re: build mechanisms Peter Firmstone
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- Re: build mechanisms Peter Firmstone
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- Re: build mechanisms Tom Hobbs
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG
- Re: build mechanisms Dennis Reedy
- Re: build mechanisms Sim IJskes - QCG