On 18-01-11 09:57, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Perhaps you might like to assist with the investigation / experiment? We
can delay the vote until we've got a better understanding of the
benefits and pitfalls.
I'm just following what Dennis has donated on River-300, I'm no expert.
I don't reject the idea that there is something better than ant for
building. But throwing things away based on a prototype for a new build,
i'm against.
I'm happy with ant. If somebody else would start a design document on
the wiki, i will contribute in a positive and constructive way, even if
that means that ant has to go in the end. But i wont contribute any time
to the build process (other than the design effort) until this has been
resolved, i consider it wasted time if i do.
Please do not confuse this with a +1 vote for removing the old build
system. The vote should come after the design phase.
Gr. Sim
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
