I hope that, if I go ahead with this, I'll be able to get feedback on
requirements. The basic concept, as I understand it, is to make a
JavaSpace go on operating correctly even in the face of a server failure.
Do you need to bring in a new server to replace a failed server, to
maintain the same level of redundancy, without shutting down the JavaSpace?
I would welcome pointers to articles that discuss the issues.
Would you do your JavaSpace operations under control of transactions?
Patricia
On 2/9/2011 3:28 PM, Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
+1. The lack of partitioning and fault-tolerance is exactly what's
keeping my current employer from using Outrigger, though they'd love
to. They do use Jini, though, so they'd be an easy sell if such a
thing were available.
-jeff
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Patricia Shanahan<p...@acm.org> wrote:
What do others think of this general idea, as a development direction for
River?
