I presume that patches and bug fixes would still be accepted? It
works pretty well as it is ...
The big problem is the Apache 2.0 port, correct? I've forgotten what
the huge issue with that is?
Colman
On 7 Feb 2007, at 15:03, Rob Sciuk wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, David Welton wrote:
In conclusion, it looks as if there are several people concerned
about
Rivet's future, but none of them are able to do anything about it.
Those that are able to do something are in various stages of
abandoning the project.
Not a good situation. Perhaps the best course of action at this
point
is to try and wrap things up into a 1.0 and archive it.
Truly a pity, as Rivet is a pleasure to develop in, but without
critical mass, it is of course doomed. Having said that, the svn
version last I checked (about 2 weeks ago) worked ok on FreeBSD 6.2-
Release using Apache 1.3.37 from the ports, and using the config
info in the README.Freebsd.
Cheers,
Rob Sciuk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
