On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:34:17 -0600, Damon Courtney wrote > If Karl says it's ready and he's already using it in production, > that's good enough for me. Push it. > > Also, I've been thinking maybe we need to enable > SeparateVirtualInterps by default. I realize it's my own stupidity, > but when developing in a dev vs. production environment (usually on > different virtual hosts), this really hosed me up the other night > until I figure it out. Is there really a good reason someone would > WANT all the interps to serve every domain? >
> I'm sure there are reasons why (multiple domains all hosting the > same site and content), but should that really be the default case? > yes you're right, I don't see it. If you want to have virtual hosts you almost certainly want to have separation. I think the user should be warned that failing to understand this point could lead to conflicts and inconsistencies. The manual should stress this out. -- Massimo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscr...@tcl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-h...@tcl.apache.org
