On 1/31/11 11:34 AM, "Damon Courtney" <da...@tclhome.com> wrote:

>If Karl says it's ready and he's already using it in production, that's
>good enough for me.  Push it.

Completely solid.

>Also, I've been thinking maybe we need to enable SeparateVirtualInterps
>by default.  I realize it's my own stupidity, but when developing in a
>dev vs. production environment (usually on different virtual hosts), this
>really hosed me up the other night until I figure it out.  Is there
>really a good reason someone would WANT all the interps to serve every
>domain?

443 / 80 needn't be handled by different interpreters and a big site might
have several names, like we also serve flightaware.co.uk, but the typical
user of Rivet with more than one vhost would probably want separate
interpreters and if they were big enough to need the other style they'd
figure it out by then.  Short answer, then, is it's OK with me.


>
>I'm sure there are reasons why (multiple domains all hosting the same
>site and content), but should that really be the default case?
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscr...@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-h...@tcl.apache.org

Reply via email to