Ronnie, you saved me from doing something potentially very stupid.
Thanks for pointing this out.
I always forget to consider rivetList.c and rivetCrypt.c because they're
not documented (unlike rivetWWW.c).
It seems to me the C code provides the extended feature of returning the
unassigned elements. I will check it more carefully and in case preserve
it dropping the Tcl procedure.
DIO implementation was kept because it might exist code calling this
function as a member procedure of DIO derived class using the '$this
<method>' form.
-- Massimo
The implementation in dio.tcl was kept
On 02/07/2014 03:11 PM, Ronnie Brunner wrote:
Hi Massimo
4 command lassign_array was replicated from class ::DIO::Database
(being totally general and independent from member variables) and
promoted to core command
Plausible list except for - and that's my outside view ;-) - this
number 4: In Rivet I see a C implementation of lassign_array
(rivetList.c) and a Tcl implementation (so far) in dio.tcl. They don't
do the same thing. If you promote the dio version to core command,
you'll change the mechanics of the existing C implementation. Don't
you? Again: me not using Rivet doesn't really make me understand what
I'm saying ;-)
Best regards
Ronnie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscr...@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-h...@tcl.apache.org
