hi
Recently John wrote
Yes. Run the hashupd.sh script but do not run rkhunter with the
--update option again. It will mess up your local hashes. This has all been
sorted out in the next release, but for the moment using hashupd.sh
is the only way to get good hashes working.
Question
Until the rkh version is updated what is wrong with
1 running hashupd to get hash support for unsupported os
2 running rkh --update
3 redoing the hashupd?
Would this not ensure at some stage the other data files
are up-to-date and just require an overwrite of the defaulthashes.dat file
in /usr/local/rkhunter/lib/rkhunter/db?
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
