On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 23:59 +1100, Gordon wrote: > > Recently John wrote > Yes. Run the hashupd.sh script but do not run rkhunter with the > --update option again. It will mess up your local hashes. This has all been > sorted out in the next release, but for the moment using hashupd.sh > is the only way to get good hashes working. > > Question > > Until the rkh version is updated what is wrong with > 1 running hashupd to get hash support for unsupported os > 2 running rkh --update > 3 redoing the hashupd? > Nothing wrong with that.
> Would this not ensure at some stage the other data files > are up-to-date and just require an overwrite of the defaulthashes.dat file > in /usr/local/rkhunter/lib/rkhunter/db? > Yes. The situation is confusing enough as it is, I just didn't want to confuse things even more by suggesting running hashupd/rkh --update/hashupd. John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rkhunter-users mailing list Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
