On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 23:31 +0100, Colin Brace wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2008 10:53 PM, John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 15:55 +0100, Colin Brace wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, I unmounted /dev/fd. rkhunter then runs fine.
> > >
> > > The one thing I notice though is that rkh didn't explicitly check the
> > > log files mentioned in the error messages I was getting. Do you have
> > > any idea why with fdesc enabled it is suddenly looking in /var/log?
> > >
> > I don't understand this bit. I saw nothing in the original message about
> > RKH looking in /var/log for anything.
> 
> On the basis of the error messages I see, rkh *appears* to be
> searching /dev/fd# for log files, i.e., the contents of /var/log. Here
> is a small sample of what I see:
> 
> find: /dev/fd/3/mount.yesterday: No such file or directory
> find: /dev/fd/3/setuid.today: No such file or directory
>
I suspect RKH is running the hidden files/directories test. It looks
in /dev for these using the 'find' command. I don't think it looks
in /var/log for any of the tests. Of course I could be wrong :-)

Can you run 'rkhunter --debug ...' with any other options you usually
use. This will create the file '/tmp/rkhunter-debug'. Can you then email
that file to me please. I probably can't help too much with the fdesc
problem itself, but may be able to get RKH to be a bit more
friendly/helpful in this situation. It will also show me which actual
test is being run.



John.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK  Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users

Reply via email to