Thanks John.  I stopped the udev service and the pid file disappeared so
I'm confident that the /var/run/udev.pid file belongs to the udev service.
I'm not sure why this would have just suddenly appears as I *think I had
udev already installed and running.

For now I've added RTKT_FILE_WHITELIST=/var/run/udev.pid" to my
/etc/rkhunter.conf file and a subsequent scan came back without any
warnings.

Thanks again for the assistance and insight.
Patrick.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:56 PM John Horne <john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk>
wrote:

> On Sun, 2019-02-24 at 11:33 -0600, Patrick Kirchner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have this warning, which is new for my system, this morning in the
> > rkhunter.log report.
> >
> > The contents of /var/run/udev.pid are just 3219, which matches the udevd
> > process:
> >
> > ps -ef |grep 3219
> > root      3219     1  0 Feb23 ?        00:00:00 /sbin/udevd
> >
> > /sbin/udevd reports as an ELF binary:
> >
> > sudo file  /sbin/udevd
> > /sbin/udevd: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
> > dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for
> GNU/Linux
> > 3.2.0, stripped
> >
> > It looks to belong to the installed udevd package on my Gentoo system:
> >
> > equery b  /sbin/udevd
> >  * Searching for /sbin/udevd ...
> > sys-fs/eudev-3.2.5 (/sbin/udevd)
> >
> > Can I somehow safely whitelist this file in /etc/rkhunter.conf?  I don't
> see
> > any other PID files whitelisted so I'm hesitant to do this.  If so, is
> there
> > a special syntax for whitelisted a PID file as opposed to
> SCRIPTWHITELIST ?
> >
> Without installing gentoo, it is a bit difficult to see (using google) if
> udev
> creates a pid file in /run/udev. (My fedora system does not.)
> On the one hand if xorddos was present then I would have expected to have
> seen
> more than one warning (there are several checks for xorddos, so receiving
> just
> the one warning sways me towards a false-positive).
> On the other hand, why has this just started now? I assume you had udevd
> running before, and have run rkhunter on the system before. So why is the
> pid
> file only now created and detected? That seems suspicious.
>
> In answer to your question though, take a look at the config option
> RTKT_FILE_WHITELIST.
>
>
>
> John.
>
> --
> John Horne | Senior Operations Analyst | Technology and Information
> Services
> University of Plymouth | Drake Circus | Plymouth | Devon | PL4 8AA | UK
> ________________________________
> [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]<
> http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass>
>
> This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for
> the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the
> information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it.
> If you have received this email in error please let the sender know
> immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not
> necessarily secure. While we take every care, University of Plymouth
> accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan
> emails and their attachments. University of Plymouth does not accept
> responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this
> email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless
> accompanied by an official order form.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rkhunter-users mailing list
> Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
>
_______________________________________________
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users

Reply via email to