Hi, On Thursday 30 September 2010, meik michalke wrote: > at this moment i don't need them. i had pdftk added while i was already > using system calls anyway, as a convenience. the really important part > (TeXing the reports) is sufficiently handled by R, i'm happy with that. it > added nicely to the readability of the plugin code, too, and i don't > consider the PDF export "experimental" any more.
ok. > i'd rather discuss ideas for a plugin repository, still ;-) Yes, I knew this was coming... There are a few low-level things that I would like to take care of next (including addressing the performance problems in object modification detection). I don't know, how much time that will take. For downloadable plugins, I was thinking to use the "Get Hot New Stuff"-framework (ghns.freedesktop.org). This is supported by kdelibs, and so adding this will not require too much work on the C++-side (I hope). However, I have not done much reading on this, and I don't know what the provider, data, and meta-files would look like, exactly, how the data should be packaged, etc. So - if you have some time, and you could try to find out about that, that would really be helpful. Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
