Hi,

On Wednesday 06 October 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
> One thing we have to be careful is that "make" / "make install" should
> work even without an internet connection. (Or is it safe to assume
> that wherever / whoever is installing RKWard has access to the
> internet?)

I should have explained better: The idea was precisely to generate the 
documenation only on the developer's system. makedist.sh is a script which I 
run to *create* the source releases. It is not needed during make / make 
install / at runtime.

> I haven't looked, but AFAIK, we do not have a NAMESPACE for rkward
> package, right? So, there is no issue of "export"ing. But I would like
> to have a namepsace and export only those functions which are in
> public*.R.

In principle this would probably be a good idea. However, several of the 
functions in internal.R are called from C++-code. If these are no longer 
exported, we'd have to find all those places, and fix them to use 
rkward:::something(), instead. So this would require great care, and quite 
some grep'ping. I certainly won't stop you from working on this, though.

Regards
Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
RKWard-devel mailing list
RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel

Reply via email to