hi, the recent SVN version of the rkwardtests package now works. rktest.makeplugintests() now has a new "testroot" element to specify the path to the test suite, as well as the wished for "append" and "test.id" elements.
speaking of potentially malicious code: i noticed that
rktest.cleanRKTestSuite() (see internal functions) in it's current state can
be quite dangerous. it deletes every file that is not a test standard file
inside directories called getwd()/su...@id. fortunately, that caused it to
stop before it would erase my $HOME when i tried rktest.makeplugintests() with
an absolute path to the test suite file, before i made testroot mandatory.
this should probably be revised to a more robust workflow, but with the added
need for a testroot definition it's not a top priority issue at the moment.
try to install the package, load it, an run
rktest.makeplugintests("a_testsuite.R", "/path/to/rkward/tests/")
rktest.makeplugintests(c("suite_a.R", "suite_b.R"), "/path/to/rkward/tests/")
rktest.makeplugintests(
testsuites="a_testsuite.R",
testroot= "/path/to/rkward/tests/",
test.id=c("one.id", "anotherone"))
to test it!
Am Donnerstag, 7. Oktober 2010, 09:52:50 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> it seems you can rewrite that as
> roxygen <- function () NULL
you're right, that works. i've changed that in SVN already and dropped the
roxygen dependency.
> Also, with version 0.1-2 of roxygen, I can simply write
> [in directory rpackages]
> R CMD roxygen rkwardtests/
doesn't work for me, unfortunately -- it stops with a "command roxygen not
found" error. i installed the package to local libs and they're ignored,
although R_LIBS and R_LIBS_USER are set accordingly (when i start R itself,
all packages are found). i figured i could use my time more productively if i
just skipped the effort and stick with roxygenize() ;-) but if anyone has a
hint how it could work from command line, i'm open to suggestions.
> R CMD roxygen rkwardtests/ rkwardtests/
> to make it write the new .Rd files in place).
i actually avoid that on purpose to be able to diff pre and post change docs,
if i desire to. but that's just me ;-)
> I think that could shorten your script, considerably.
hm, what do you mean? it would surely replace two "cp *.Rd" lines with one "R
CMD" line (and shorten the R function to the system call), but not affect the
remaining parts, would it?
viele grüße :: m.eik
--
dipl. psych. meik michalke
abt. f"ur diagnostik und differentielle psychologie
institut f"ur experimentelle psychologie
heinrich-heine-universit"at d"usseldorf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
