Hi, On Thursday 11 August 2011, meik michalke wrote: > yes, for the writing part paste()ing it together should be easy. in case we > want to go the other direction and read/parse the XML tree, reliably > writing that ourselves would be a little more demanding. > > it would be helpful to have an update function as well, e.g. to change the > date and version number without the need to manually edit this or that > file. hm... could we maybe do both? then we could use the DCF for reading, > it would be very easy to update single fields without the need to write > special stuff, and to update the XML in one go with the DCF file we would > just use the paste() method and replace the whole <about> section.
hm, I don't like the thought of having a duplicate structure, if we can reasonably avoid it. If users start to mix editing by hand and editing via a function, this will lead to inconsistencies. No idea why there appear to be problems with the XML package on Windows, but given that this is a rather often-used package, I would hope that these problems are temporary, and the XML package can at least be used for non- critical stuff. Or am I too optimistic, here? Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
