Hi,

On Friday 12 August 2011, meik michalke wrote:
> i tried to make the XML paste function rather generic, although this is
> just a first round... but with some tweaking we could later re-use it,
> e.g., to write helpful functions like
> 
>  rk.create.tabbook(tabs=2, labels=c("Data", "Options"))
>  ...
> 
> should this go into another package (rkwardplugdev?) or something already
> present?

I'm not sure, how far we will go, here. If you are going to add a whole bunch 
more functions along those lines, then, yes, these should go to a dedicated 
package.

For the moment, however, I see the most convincing use-case for a single 
function
  rk.create.plugin.skeleton()
(of which rk.write.about()) is the most complex part. (And possibly, later, an 
additional function which will update the meta information in an existing 
rkward plugin pack/package).
As long as that is all we offer, it can reasonably be included in the rkward 
package, IMO.

The helper functions (pasteXMLTag(), etc.) should probably be moved into 
rk.write.about() as local functions. Of course, I wouldn't mind depending on 
your XiMpLe package, for this purpose, once that is stable enough and on CRAN.

Regards
Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management 
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. 
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
RKWard-devel mailing list
RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel

Reply via email to