Hi, On Friday 23 September 2011, meik michalke wrote: > at some point you were thinking about making it possible for RKWard to > manage R sessions running on distant machines.
yes, but it's not really a short-term vision. > i guess the underlying > difficulties are related, aren't they? They are. Although for the remote R backend feature several more issue will have to be taken care of: 1) More modular initialization (basically the same thing which needs to be done for the re-starting feature). 2) Implement a feature + GUI to set up a port-forwarding / tunnelling between frontend and backend machines. Also some common disk-space will have to be mounted on the backend machine. 3) The most fun: Find all uses of plain file names passed between frontend and backend, and add a proper "translation" between file name on the frontend, and the backend. In some cases, automatic copying of files to the common disk-space will be need. > maybe this could be implemented in > one effort, for a next release. Well, never say never, but this means a fairly large time investment, and there are really a bunch of other things that I'd like to take care of before this. So I don't think the remote backend feature is going to happen this soon (unless somebody else works on it, of course). Maybe the restarting feature can be realized in the somewhat shorter term, though. Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel