Hi, On Friday 30 September 2011, meik michalke wrote: > i was only testing the daily build which seems to have fetched sources > exactly then -- now it all works like charm!
ok, good. > btw, most of all these functions run some checks on what you're trying to > do, to make it next to impossible to create invalid plugin XML code > (rk.XML.hierarchy() only accepts menu nodes as children, etc.). Which reminds me - again - that we should really have a formal DTD for our XML files. That would also make it really easy to check existing plugins for many types of errors which don't currently get caught, including the type/types-bug you found, recently. I don't know how you like that idea, but in theory, once we have a DTD, it should also be possible to generate a large portion of the XML functions you have written, automatically, from that... Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
