Corect, dar daca trimiti normal ca pe vremuri prin sendmai -t sau ceva de genul, se prinde ca nu este authenticated, si nu il accepta.
Vroiam doar sa mentionez ca nu mai este de ajuns SPF pentru gmail, asa a inceput thread-ul ;) On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 3:57 PM Petru Rațiu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 4:48 PM Cristian Paslaru <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> https://blog.google/products/gmail/gmail-security-authentication-spam-protection/ >> >> >> >> *By February 2024, Gmail will start to require that bulk >> senders:Authenticate their email: You shouldn’t need to worry about the >> intricacies of email security standards, but you should be able to >> confidently rely on an email’s source. So we're requiring those who send >> significant volumes to strongly authenticate their emails following >> well-established best practices. Ultimately, this will close loopholes >> exploited by attackers that threaten everyone who uses email.* >> >> > Astea le zic la fiecare schimbare, ma indoiesc ca badici.ro e bulk > sender, si vad ca Mihai e oricum vag confuz despre ce e spf-ul si cu ce ne > ajuta sau incurca el in viata. Asteptam logurile si o descriere mai > adecvata a problemei inainte sa speculam. Cum ziceam si mai devreme, mailul > catre mine a fost livrat direct si n-a mieunat absolut nimic prin headere, > suspectez o problema de layer 8 undeva. > > -- > P. > _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug_lists.lug.ro
