On 20 Dec 2001, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 11:25, Mihai RUSU wrote: > > > > iar in general vormind cu 2.4.x am avut mai multe probleme decat cu 2.2.x > > (deci nu zic ca 2.2.x nu are probleme) > > Dupa cum se exprima Rik van Riel intr-un reply pe lkml catre Linus: > "Don't forget the fact that 2.4 is the first kernel you managed to get > stable under high load since 1.2" > serios ? (/me foarte mirat) pai atunci toate sistemele de productie care erau pana la 2.4 crapau periodic sau cum? ---------------------------- Mihai RUSU "... and what if this is as good as it gets ?" --- Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to unsubscribe from this list.
