O observatie pertinenta :-)
----- Forwarded message from Greg Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: "Greg Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Google Attitude was RE: Unclassified Disk "Sanitizers"
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:02:03 -0800
Organization: Flashaccess.com, Inc.
Message-ID: <002901c1c0a3$8f0bc500$0e0101c0@frankenstien>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
I know what you mean. It seems to me that a lot of people take
for granted the knowledge that they have. I mean, not everybody knows
WHAT to search for on google. They usually need a point in the right
direction, and that is what this list is for.
There is one LUG I know that has a few people who are starting
to get the "google attitude" and I don't like it, it brings the
community down. My mom knows nothing about computers and can't just
tell her to RTFM. I have to step her through logging in to XP, logging
on to the internet, and opening explorer, etc. HELP people, don't make
them feel stupid.
BTW, this list contains a plethora of knowledge for which I am
grateful for :) Thanks all!
Greg Horne
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harris Samuel W PORT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:15 AM
> To: 'Phil Park'; Sadler, Connie J
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Unclassified Disk "Sanitizers"
>
> I am really disappointed in the continuing answer "use Google"
or
> use something else. All of the people on this list know how to use a
> search
> engine. What the beginners are asking is for advice on which ones are
good
> sites and which ones are bad. I remember the trouble I had finding
good
> sites. My time was very limited and I needed to concentrate on getting
the
> best info in the little time available to me. This is Security BASICS
> after
> all. There are a lot of beginners on this list and understandably
there
> will
> be a lot of duplication of questions and answers. What were you people
> like
> in the beginning of your studies. I am sure we are all alike. I knew
next
> to
> nothing and thanks to a great bunch of people I was able to gather a
lot
> of
> info despite thanks to the "use Google" crowd.
>
> Samuel Harris
> A+, MCP, Networking Certificate, Phi Theta Kappa
> Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
> Portsmouth , NH 03801
> (207) 438-1275
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 10:50 AM
> To: Sadler, Connie J
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Unclassified Disk "Sanitizers"
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> PGP (go to www.pgpi.org) has a wipe feature. The Windows version will
wipe
> files and free space as well.
>
> You can also go to google and search for "secure delete".
>
> thx
> - --phil
> - --
> phil park
> system administrator
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 208.885.5562 (phone)
> 208.885.7099 (fax)
> 419.730.3247 (e-fax)
> http://www.csds.uidaho.edu
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Sadler, Connie J wrote:
>
> >
> > Does anyone have recommendations for freeware or shareware that
> effectively
> > erases disks for unclassified but sensitive information? This would
be
> used
> > for all machines "retired" to school programs, etc. We need one for
> Windows
> > and one for UNIX, if one tool can't clean both types of disks.
Anybody
> have
> > experience with this?
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Connie
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5.8
>
> iQEVAwUBPHe58FDd4eFw884XAQEZ9wf+PjDitYEWW8ctMhXEPRZbFscGXwOGSN+Q
> psrqZtKT86Mw3wlQJHtIS0n8ClN4vshytnFy1KOhrAHTHmPnfdAimxUOXd8Fhwpv
> 55cv/2DdvBZn58QJXUQsAVekNZXDnwX79kcKwHFtWBv/bAGOvP+EZI3nsZsElOkh
> a+N0VWhuVwYfjE0z8I6EcH2FTXZ8dw7JMmvvV55ijy2KrO2wEGSpbnCD9nHwety4
> K+8N8u/3j469uO0PZXGSFmQ6HBDclz0eWdrYyf0pUZevggZmIDuxbz5XCJw9s0FE
> qIlAsBX57YcpFEYRY5WCHncA+o8V33s/jh/nllxpKlF80YRrBrG0bg==
> =qP3v
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This e-mail was scanned by RAV AntiVirus!
on behalf of GeCAD Software.
----- End forwarded message -----
-- teodor
---
Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to
unsubscribe from this list.
