> Nu uita ca pe mine ma intereseaza aceasta problema si ca atare am > citit, de la cap la coada, link-urile care au fost furnizate in cele > trei mesaje de raspuns. > Insa imi vine greu sa cred ca in acest timp nimeni nu a mai dezvoltat > nimic la BASH, TCSH si alte shell-uri.
Zau si FAQ-ul de la www.tcsh.org ? Eu nu prea cred. Acolo iti rezolva problema da... Citez din http://www.tcsh.org/FAQ: 27. Where can I learn the merits of tcsh vs. bash vs. csh vs. sh etc? You can read the manual page section titled [NEW FEATURES] listing features that tcsh adds to csh. You can read Tom Christiansen's [Csh Programming Considered Harmful], a document advocating that csh (and by extension, tcsh) should not be used for writing shell scripts. XXX: Need to find something about [bash], but bash is sh-compatible and has many of the same interactive features of tcsh (command completion does not appear to be as flexible, though). [Curtains up: introducing the Z shell] has a pretty good rundown on zsh. Aside from the arguments about csh being evil, tcsh appears to compare well with zsh [zsh]. Zsh is sh and ksh compatible, with many of the interactive features of tcsh. Apoi fatza de [Csh Programming Considered Harmful] vezi [NEW FEATURES] si iti dai seama ce au mai corectat... Bafta. -- Claudiu GPG Key: http://maya.cnixs.com/~claudiu/claudiu.gpg
