Grant Miner posted some interesting benchmark results to the lkml, = comparing five journaling filesystems available with the current = 2.6.0-test2 development kernel. The tests were conducted with a very = simple shell script, mainly timing how long it takes to copy, tar, and = remove directories, performing several syncs in between. He summarizes:
- ext3's syncs tended to take the longest [at] 10 seconds, except - JFS took a whopping 38.18s on its final sync - xfs used more CPU than ext3 but was slower than ext3 - reiser4 had highest throughput and most CPU usage - jfs had lowest throughput and least CPU usage ce vreau eu sa spun este ca nu-mi vine sa cred afirmatia asta cu xfs-ul --=20 save the ozone layer --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
