I cannot talk much about the suit.. 

I can say, that when I'm asked "where did you get the idea for that algorithm" I have 
no concerns that I MIGHT have seen it in SCO code.

 - jim

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:13:57 -0800
"Robinson, Eric R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Oh, great, thanks a lot. Now I have to *think* before I act. ;-)
> 
> Well, my first reaction is that the comments from the gallery are wise and
> true, in addition to being no darn fun at all. 
> 
> James, what is the claim at the core of the SCO thing? I thought SCO's
> complaint was based on snippets of identical source code, not on mere
> suspicion that somebody once had access to SCO intellectual properly and may
> have viewed it. Viewing intellectual property is not the same as stealing
> it, or is it? Reading the Telltale Heart is not the same as plagiarizing
> Poe.
> 
> Forgive my deliberate naivet� here. Sometimes I learn better this way.
> 
> --Eric
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kyle T. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:15 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [RLUG] Leaked MS Code
> > 
> > 
> > Not only open source projects, but any project. Having looked at the
> > leaked Windows source could potentialy effect your future 
> > employability as
> > many companies will not want to employ someone that has been 
> > tainted by
> > seeing MS's intellectual property. It is probably best to 
> > just stay as far
> > away from it as possible.
> > 
> > Kyle
> > 
> > > I hate to be a pain in the backside about this... but if 
> > you EVER plan on
> > > being part of an open source project, I'd suggest you NEVER 
> > look at this
> > > code. I'm smack dab in the middle of this SCO mess, and it 
> > is sure nice to
> > > be able to tell the lawyers that I've never seen an SCO source code.
> > >
> > >  - jim
> > >
> > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:49:56 -0800
> > > "Robinson, Eric R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Anybody get a peek at the leaked Windows source code yet? 
> > I downloaded a
> > >> copy of it last night, but I have not looked at it yet. It 
> > is 800+ MB
> > >> zipped. That's a heap o' source code (pardon the programming pun).
> > >>
> > >> --Eric
> > >>
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > RLUG mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > RLUG mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> RLUG mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
> 
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug

Reply via email to