On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 14:25, Hector E. Urtubia wrote: > Todd is right, NAT is not really a security measure, just a clever way to > overcome the shortage of IPv4. This paper shows a technique to count the > hosts behind a NAT. > > http://www.research.att.com/~smb/papers/fnat.pdf > > wow.. hadn't posted to the list in a while...
Hector lives! Could someone describe an attack that could happen to a NAT, other than "it is bad, don't do it"? So far we can count how many hosts there are, but now what? Mark _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
