> We have developed a "warm" standby backup > approach that mitigates the effects of a corrupt message store, but > this workaround leads to a very high cost of ownership. >
What causes the high TCO? It must be the cost of high-end server hardware, because having a warm standby Exchange server does not require additional CALs, which is usually the biggest monetary bite. > To make a long story shorter, we decided on Communigate Pro > because of its flawless > (http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/12/12/49TCstalker_1.html) > integration with Outlook. According to the article, it meets "most essential Exchange groupware requirements," and supports "most" Exchange functionality. Also, it does not support Outlook forms, which are an integral component of many companies' internal communication strategy. I don't want to be mean, but this really does not qualify as flawless. Add to that the fact that it does not have anything very comparable to Outlook Web Access, and I'm not really sure you can say it has a lower TCO. --Eric _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
