[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send RLUG mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of RLUG digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. VPN setup help needed - paying job! (Ed Jaeger)
2. Re: Tor Exit Servers (Bruce Robertson)
3. Re: Tor Exit Servers (Bruce Robertson)
4. Re: Tor Exit Servers (Todd A. Jacobs)
5. Re: Tor Exit Servers (Todd A. Jacobs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:04:42 -0700
From: Ed Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [RLUG] VPN setup help needed - paying job!
To: Reno Linux Users Group
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
I need help setting up a VPN. It's for my employer, a for-profit
company, so we're happy to pay for the support, and I'd prefer to
support a member of the local community.
We're setting up a VPN for remote access to our corporate network.
Essentially all the clients (except me) will be using Billyware to
access our ERP system from the field.
We have a T1 (some of which is used for voice) with a /29 assigned to
us. I have shorewall (2.0.13) running on a linux box doing NAT/firewall
from our internal RFC1918 network to the internet - our mail & website
are done by the fine folks at GBIS so we don't currently run any servers
internally.
To keep things nice and clean I have added a third card to the firewall
box and assigned it it's own address out of our /29. I set up OpenVPN
(2.0.5) and generated a bunch of client certificates. It starts up
fine, I (and others) can connect to it just fine, but I just cannot get
the clients to see any machines on the internal network once they
connect. I've followed the fine instructions from
http://www.shorewall.net/OPENVPN.html
but either I've messed up or something's actually broken.
If you are able to help let me know - we're in the North end of Carson
City, but I have ssh and webmin running on the firewall machine and can
set up remote access for you if that's all you need.
--
Ed Jaeger
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:07:53 -0700
From: Bruce Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RLUG] Tor Exit Servers
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The blog is at: http://ceoblog.gbis.com
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO +1-775-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc. company-wide fax: +1-775-348-9412
http://www.greatbasin.net my efax: +1-775-201-1553
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:31:28PM -0700, Bruce Robertson wrote:
>
>
>> I've never understood why other providers attempt to restrict types of
>> traffic. It's doomed anyway - people will always find a way around
>> any restrictions.
>>
>
> I think the theory is that it allows them to over-subscribe their
> networks while promoting the big, fat pipes no one can actually use
> within the TOS. Even accessing one's own computer remotely technically
> violates some of the more abusive TOSs. If all you're allowed to do is
> surf the web and send email, one hardly needs a 256K/3MB link to
> accomplish that.
>
> Some over-subscription is essential for good capacity planning, but I
> think what the cable companies do amounts to false advertisement. I just
> wish the phone companies did a better job of servicing residential DSL
> customers so I could switch, but I think they're afraid of cannabalizing
> their more-lucrative T-1 services. *big sigh*
>
> Anyway, this concludes my periodic rant about Charter and SBC. :)
>
>
>> Thanks for giving me a new topic for my blog! :-)
>>
>
> No extra charge. :) What's your blog's URL? Googling didn't turn
> anything up for me.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rlug.org/pipermail/rlug/attachments/20060425/97598a46/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:09:57 -0700
From: Bruce Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RLUG] Tor Exit Servers
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Since not everyone can see the Hilton or the Silver Legacy, I'd be
interested in suggestions for other locations we could use. A current
possibility is the Sierra Pacific building near Meadowood Mall, but I
realize that may not work too well for South Meadows. The idea location
will itself have line of sight visibility to the Hilton or Legacy.
Suggestions?
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO +1-775-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc. company-wide fax: +1-775-348-9412
http://www.greatbasin.net my efax: +1-775-201-1553
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:08:35PM -0700, Ryan Flowers wrote:
>
>
>> I've not tried any other local DSL providers (Hi Bruce) but then again
>> I've never had the need to.
>>
>
> The problem with DSL in Sparks isn't the ISPs, it's the telcos. In my
> area, I'm far enough from the CO (~14k') that I'll be lucky to get a
> 128K downstream connection on a typical DSL line--and forget about the
> 3-6Mbps service they're advertising.
>
> Heck, if I could get even 256K upstream from someone else, I'd have
> ditched Charter a long time ago. I took a look at Clearwire recently,
> but found that:
>
> 1. Their rates are about the same as Charter, for half the speed.
> 2. Their TOS isn't any better than Charter's.
>
> Both GBIS and Pyramid need to buy their local loops from the telcos, so
> once again the small fry are at the mercy of the monopolies. *sigh*
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rlug.org/pipermail/rlug/attachments/20060425/630d9ede/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:46:01 -0700
From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RLUG] Tor Exit Servers
To: Reno Linux Users Group
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:26:41PM -0800, Kyle T.Smith wrote:
> abuse complaints due to the traffic coming over the Tor network. This
> included automated attacks against servers and the trading of copy
> protected material. As such we stopped offering ourselves up as a Tor
More on typical abuses and how to handle DMCA notices when running Tor:
http://tor.eff.org/faq-abuse.html.en#TypicalAbuses
http://tor.eff.org/eff/tor-dmca-response.html.en
So, exit servers will probably deal with abuse no matter what they do,
but I think the issues are manageable.
--
Re-Interpreting Historic Miracles with SED #141: %s/water/wine/g
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:40:17 -0700
From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RLUG] Tor Exit Servers
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:09:57AM -0700, Bruce Robertson wrote:
> Since not everyone can see the Hilton or the Silver Legacy, I'd be
> interested in suggestions for other locations we could use. A current
The Nugget is visible from just about everywhere in Sparks. Is that a
viable option?
--
Re-Interpreting Historic Miracles with SED #141: %s/water/wine/g
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
End of RLUG Digest, Vol 25, Issue 19
************************************
----- Fight back spam! Download the Blue Frog. http://www.bluesecurity.com/register/s?user=Q2hpSm9hbg%3D%3D
_______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
