> MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Although I am still skeptical, I would like to introduce a strawman
> > proposal. Please feel free to shoot it down or encourage
> > standardization.
> >
> > http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~eb2m-mrt/hidden/spec.html
> > <http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/%7Eeb2m-mrt/hidden/spec.html>
> >
> > > There are reasons why RELAX NG provides no way to specify a schema
> > > location in a document.
> >
> > I have been always against the idea of introducing schema-associating
> > PIs. My arguments are similar to the ones raised by Tommie and Bob.
>
> +1.
>
> Please no more processing instructions! I'm an elements, attributes and
> text person. I build everything I can with those three and only step
> outside it for compatability with other specs.
On the contrary, I think that processing instructions are very
appropriate for that task: they are the only solution that will be
skipped by any XML application that does not care about the information
they convey. Furthermore, this information is, by nature, a processing
instruction!
Eric
--
Lisez-moi sur XMLfr.
http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "rng-users" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
