> >
> > Please no more processing instructions! I'm an elements, attributes and
> > text person. I build everything I can with those three and only step
> > outside it for compatability with other specs.
>
> Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> On the contrary, I think that processing instructions are very
> appropriate for that task: they are the only solution that will be
> skipped by any XML application that does not care about the information
> they convey. Furthermore, this information is, by nature, a processing
> instruction!
>
Eric,
Best if we agree to differ here rather than replay years of xml-dev
debate :-)
cheers,
Sean
---- LSpots keywords ?> ---- HM ADS ?>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "rng-users" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
