Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > / Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > | harmless compared to <!DOCTYPE or xsi:schemaLocation because such PI don't > | have side effects. Applications that take care can use PI to fetch and use > | custom schema for guided editing or validation. Most of applications will > | simply ignore this PI and will process document as general XHTML code which > | is a right thing here. > > Yep. I'm not really arguing against the PI as much as lamenting the > fact that the locating rules aren't more powerful and more portable.
And I guess I'd argue that before having a discussion about other solutions such as the proposed PI, maybe we ought to first have a discussion about whether locating rules could be made more powerful and more portable, and if so, exactly how. --Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
