MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote: > If the camp trying to standardize PIs is not the majority > of the RELAX NG community, I do not think that PIs will take off. > > Here is my understanding of the current status. Please let me know > if I misinterprets somebody. > > For schema-associating PIs > Jirka Kosek > Robin Berjon > George Cristian Bina
Sorry to answer so late, I've been on vacation. Just for the record, if you are going to be counting heads in the RNG community, I think I would be best counted as "neutral". My take on this is that a schema PI is just as bad an idea as a stylesheet PI, which is to say that it's most of the time a very bad idea (and in the absence of a processing model, dreadfully underspecified in its interactions with other specs at that), but *if* people are going to be doing it anyway (as seems to be the case) then I would prefer that there is a standard made by people who understand the issues and limitations of this approach rather than ad hoc proprietary options mades by people who are probably smart and probably understand some of the problems, but won't benefit from the head-banging that some form of community standard would get (or rather, is getting). -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> <font face=arial size=-1><a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h49cjvu/M=362329.6886308.7839368.1510227/D=groups/S=1706030390:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1122865282/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992 ">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font> --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
