Le lundi 12 septembre 2005 à 14:30 -0400, John.Cowan a écrit :
> Eric van der Vlist scripsit:
>
> > And
> > 1.5) Is this string a valid instance of you given these
> > parameters.
>
> Yes. A parameterized version of a type is still a type: integer
> {minInclusive = "1", maxInclusive = "100"} is just as much of a type as
> double.
Hmmm... I had read your previous post assuming that you were only
speaking of "predefined" types.
If by "type" you mean both "parameterized" and predefined type, then it
would be clearer to note that RNG doesn't let you ask the second
question ("Are these two strings equal according to your definition of
equality?") to parameterized versions of a type.
That doesn't make a lot of difference for WXS datatypes, but that could
be a strong restriction for other type systems.
Eric
--
Don't you think all these XML schema languages should work together?
http://dsdl.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/2U_rlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
