Dave Pawson wrote:
The world seems not to be convinced of this Robin. I'm having the problem with a group I'm working with, they want XSD (because all the other lemmings do) and are not convinced that Relax is any more expressive than RNG.Has anyone collated the difference and made it public?
Probably co-occurences and interleave are features that difference RNG from WXS the most.
From developer point of view RELAX NG also offers better modularity and compact syntax.
However I would not suggest RELAX NG for all projects. If data-binding is your main interest than unambiguity of WXS is good. Otherwise RNG is better. If I will made it oversimplicated then WXS is for data folks and RNG for document folks. But you know that boundary between data and documents is quite fuzzy :-)
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nejbližší termíny školení: DocBook 5.-7.12. * XSL-FO 19.-20.12.
XSLT 17.-20.10. * XML schémata (včetně RELAX NG) 7.-9.11.
------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
