> However I would not suggest RELAX NG for all projects. If data-binding > is your main interest than unambiguity of WXS is good. Otherwise RNG is > better. If I will made it oversimplicated then WXS is for data folks and > RNG for document folks. But you know that boundary between data and > documents is quite fuzzy :-)
Is it true that RELAX NG allows ambiguous grammars and such grammers are problematic for data-binding. Thus, data binding tools for RELAX NG (e.g., JAXB, Relaxer, and RelaxNGCC) actually supports unambiguous RELAX NG grammars. You only have to write unambiguous grammars in RELAX NG for handling data. Since RELAX NG is much simpler than W3C XML Schema, develop data binding tools for RELAX NG should be easier to develop. Cheers, Makoto ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/2U_rlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
