Comment #12 on issue 1018 by [email protected]: Alternative extension for test data in plain text files
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=1018

Can we make this configurable?

We have 2 projects which use RF and we would like both of them to have unique extensions. Mostly to be able to support different syntax highlighting between the two. Maybe add a commandline parameter

--extension txt:test:abcd|txt:resource:efgh|html:test:hijk| html:resource:lmno

This basically says that

'abcd' extension maps to a 'txt' Test
'hijk' extension maps to a 'html' Test
'efgh' extension maps to a 'txt' Resource
'lmno' extension maps to a 'html' Resource


Reply via email to