Comment #12 on issue 1018 by [email protected]: Alternative extension
for test data in plain text files
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=1018
Can we make this configurable?
We have 2 projects which use RF and we would like both of them to have
unique extensions. Mostly to be able to support different syntax
highlighting between the two. Maybe add a commandline parameter
--extension txt:test:abcd|txt:resource:efgh|html:test:hijk|
html:resource:lmno
This basically says that
'abcd' extension maps to a 'txt' Test
'hijk' extension maps to a 'html' Test
'efgh' extension maps to a 'txt' Resource
'lmno' extension maps to a 'html' Resource