Could you outline what this case is? I would prefer to have the data on the connection fixed. This would allow for optimisations later on.
Cheers, Jakob > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Janosch Machowinski > Sent: Donnerstag, 6. März 2014 19:03 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Rock-dev] assumptions in joint_dispatcher > > Hey, > I just ran into some assumptions that are used in the joint_dispatcher. The > code assumes, that the input size and the input name order of a > base::sample::Joints never changes. > For my use case this assumption is not working. > Should I change the code and remove this assumption ? > Greetings > Janosch > > -- > Dipl. Inf. Janosch Machowinski > SAR- & Sicherheitsrobotik > > Universität Bremen > FB 3 - Mathematik und Informatik > AG Robotik > Robert-Hooke-Straße 1 > 28359 Bremen, Germany > > Zentrale: +49 421 178 45-6611 > > Besuchsadresse der Nebengeschäftstelle: > Robert-Hooke-Straße 5 > 28359 Bremen, Germany > > Tel.: +49 421 178 45-6614 > Empfang: +49 421 178 45-6600 > Fax: +49 421 178 45-4150 > E-Mail: [email protected] > > Weitere Informationen: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/robotik > > _______________________________________________ > Rock-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev _______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
