Am 18.08.2014 17:19, schrieb Sylvain Joyeux: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Janosch Machowinski > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hm, ok. Then a question (for I guess Matthias and Thomas), if this code >> is so pre alpha, >> why in gods name are we using it to run our systems in a competition ? > Because that's their call to make. From my p.o.v.: you don't care > about the toolchain, fair enough. They do, and a competition is > actually a good place to harden software *if* you are ready to spend > the time needed to stabilize it. > > The bottom line is: if you get that on stable, you basically decide > *for me* that I should spend the time to stabilize it. You don't have > the right to do that. > > I can only repeat what I said: the only person that can decide if some > piece of code should go on stable *is the person maintaining it*. You > can't decide for him whether (1) it is of sufficient quality and (2) > that person can spend the time necessary to fix bugs quickly > (something we all expect on a stable release). woooow, were did this come from ? As you can read above, I acked your decision, that loaders does not go on the RC branch. And for my question, this has nothing to do with you. As you might know, I am involved with the spacebot. And just to return this, it is not your call, to say what software should be used in a completion, were you are not involved in. Janosch >>> +1 on Matthias' comment: a release is not meant to stabilize alpha-quality >>> code. >> Just in general : We are still in the RC phase. For me this is a phase, >> were code can still be >> integrated, or dropped. > Of unstable code ? The RC phases should be short (or you are just > creating a new 'next'), which does not allow for stabilizing unstable > code. > > Sylvain
_______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
