On 13/03/06, gl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I started this thread, let me try to close it. > > Almost everybody who replied to it found at least some aspect of the 'no > anonymous contributions' policy undesireable or flawed - yet the leads > aren't even responding to the points and questions raised. So basically > it's 'take it or leave it' from them. Draw your own conclusions. fyi, i recognise at least 4 of the core devs replyied... > > Just checked the poll, the good news is that not many people seem to have > felt the need to sign up with a false name. The question is, how many > people are simply not signing up because of this? > OR... you have to remember you did it on a anonymouse poll site.. so the same person/ppl could have answered more than once.. so the poll is hugly flawed anyway :p
> As for me, I'm going back to leeching of everybody else's good work here and > keeping my improvements to myself. Carry on... > -- > gl > >
